4.2 Article

Effects of high temperature on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, chloroplast ultrastructure, and antioxidant activities in fingered citron

期刊

RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 732-740

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1021443712060040

关键词

Citrus medica var. sarcodactylis; heat stress; photosynthesis; chlorophyll fluorescence; peroxidation; chloroplast ultrastructure

资金

  1. Zhejiang Technology Innovation Group Project [2011R09033-06]
  2. Zhejiang Science and Technology Project [2008C22002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effects of heat stress on the photosynthesis system and antioxidant activities in Fingered citron (Citrus medica var. sarcodactylis Swingle) were investigated. Two-year-old Fingered citron plants were exposed to different temperature (28, 35, 40, and 45A degrees C) for 6 h; then the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, chloroplast ultrastructure, and antioxidant activities in the leaves were evaluated. Exposure to 40 and 45A degrees C for 6 h resulted in a significant decrease in the photosynthetic rate (P (n)), carboxylation efficiency (CE), the maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, and the light-saturated photosynthetic rate, which were related to the reduction of CO2 assimilation, inactivation of photosystem II and photosynthetic electron transport. Moreover, transmission electron microscopy showed chloroplast ultrastructural alterations, including their swelling, matrix zone expanding, and lamella structure loosening. Furthermore, heat stress, especially at 45A degrees C, caused oxidative damage resulted from ROS accumulation in Fingered citron leaves accompanied by increases in activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase. However, exposure to 35A degrees C for 6 h or 40A degrees C for 4 h had no significant influence on the photosynthetic capacity at all. The results suggest that Fingered citron plants show no heat injury when temperature is below 40A degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据