4.6 Article

Electrocatalytic activity of Mn/Cu doped Fe2O3-PANI-rGO composites for fuel cell applications

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 49, 页码 39455-39463

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra06712j

关键词

-

资金

  1. MHRD, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low cost catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) have been successfully synthesized from a Mn/Cu doped Fe2O3-polyaniline (PANI) composite supported on reduced graphene oxide (rGO). The composite was prepared by oxidative polymerization followed by chemical reduction using hydrazine hydrate. The crystalline nature of Mn/Cu doped Fe2O3 was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) study. Surface morphology imaged by SEM shows the features of Mn/Cu doped Fe2O3 particles and PANI film on graphene sheets. The FT-IR studies revealed changes in the characteristic C-N and C = N stretching vibrations of PANI which confirmed that PANI was bonded to the surface of the graphene sheets. The Raman spectrum showed the presence of PANI on the distorted graphene layers. TG/DTA studies revealed the thermal stability and extent of loading of Mn/Cu doped Fe2O3 in the composites. The electrocatalytic activity of the catalysts has been evaluated. Enhancements of ORR performance was observed in oxygen saturated 0.1 M KOH medium using the catalyst modified rotating disc electrode (RDE) and rotating ring disc electrode (RRDE). A maximum kinetic current density of -1.82 mA cm(-2) at -0.2 V was obtained for Cu doped Fe2O3-PANI-rGO. The Cu doped Fe2O3-PANI-rGO electrocatalyst has a Tafel slope of 156 mV dec(-1), onset potential of -46.4 mV and half wave potential of -225 mV. These values were obtained from the ORR response at 1600 rpm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to study the enhancements of ORR using Mn/Cu doped Fe2O3 and PANI on a graphene support in an alkaline medium. The durability studies showed that the synthesized electrocatalyst has better stability and also higher methanol tolerance than the commercial 20 wt% Pt/C catalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据