4.0 Article

MR Imaging in cardiac amyloidosis - Morphology, function and late enhancement

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027337

关键词

heart; amyloidosis; MR imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Since limited data is available using MR imaging in cardiac amyloidosis, the purpose of our study was to evaluate morphological and functional differences of the heart using cardiac MR1. Materials and Methods: 19 consecutive patients (14 males, 5 females, mean age 59 6 years) with histologically proven cardiac amyloidosis were evaluated with MRI at 1.5 T. Results were compared with data of 10 healthy, age-matched control subjects (5 males, 5 females, mean age 60 6 years). Functional and morphological data including late enhancement (LE) was acquired. Results: Compared to the control group, patients with cardiac amyloidosis had thickened atrial walls and dilated atriums. Both ventricles and the interventricular septum were thickened. The LV hypertrophy was focal in 11/19 (58%) and global in 4/19 (21%) of patients. A myocardial edema occurred in 2/19 patients with cardiac amyloidosis (11%). An edema of the myocardium was visible in 2/19 (11%) of patients. The LV ejection fraction was statistically significantly decreased. The prevalence of LE was 74 % (14/19 of patients). LE was detected predominantly in the LV anterior wall and in the interventricular septum. Within the segments LE was located predominantly in a subendocardial location. Between patients with and without LE no statistically significant differences of functional and morphological results were able to be established. Conclusion: There are three major outcomes of our assessment: 1. The LV hypertrophy is focal in the majority of patients with cardiac amyloidosis. 2. No statistically significant differences can be established in regard to the functional and morphological features between patients with and without LE. 3. Myocardial edema is a possible feature in cardiac amyloidosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据