4.5 Article

Performance evaluation of dense mixtures with stabilised rubber modified asphalt

期刊

ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 953-965

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2014.924426

关键词

mechanical properties; dense mixture; stabilised rubber modified asphalt (SRMA); engineering properties

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51278288]
  2. China postdoctoral science foundation [2013M542412]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Asphalt rubber (AR) has been used worldwide in road engineering not only for improving the performance of asphalt mixtures but also for providing an advantage in environmental protection. Yet the application of AR is greatly restricted in China for its shortcoming of being only possible to be used in a gap or open gradation mixture to ensure stripping resistance as well as anti-rutting performance. Stabilised rubber modified asphalt (SRMA) with lower high-temperature viscosity and better store stability than traditional AR was developed in our previous research and has been widely applied in projects with good results. In this paper, to evaluate the validation of SRMA in dense mixtures, five kinds of dense mixtures commonly used in China were designed with SRMA as binder. Engineering properties, including high-temperature performance, low-temperature performance, moisture stability, fatigue performance and mechanical properties, including dynamic modulus and phase angle were laboratory evaluated and analysed. For the purpose of comparison, a kind of representative styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) polymer modified asphalt commonly used in China was selected to prepare samples with the same gradation of SRMA mixtures, and the same performance tests were conducted. In addition, a brief cost analysis among SRMA, SBS-modified asphalt and traditional AR was performed. Results show good performance and economy of SRMA and corresponding dense mixtures, thus it is possible, using SRMA for dense mixture design in practical engineering, to reduce construction cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据