4.4 Article

A long-range RNA-RNA interaction between the 5′ and 3′ ends of the HCV genome

期刊

RNA
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 1740-1752

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1261/rna.1680809

关键词

HCV; IRES; 3 ' UTR; HCV CRE; long-range RNA-RNA interactions

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [BFU2006-02568]
  2. Junta de Andalucia [CTS-233]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The RNA genome of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) contains multiple conserved structural cis domains that direct protein synthesis, replication, and infectivity. The untranslatable regions (UTRs) play essential roles in the HCV cycle. Uncapped viral RNAs are translated via an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) located at the 5' UTR, which acts as a scaffold for recruiting multiple protein factors. Replication of the viral genome is initiated at the 3' UTR. Bioinformatics methods have identified other structural RNA elements thought to be involved in the HCV cycle. The 5BSL3.2 motif, which is embedded in a cruciform structure at the 3' end of the NS5B coding sequence, contributes to the three-dimensional folding of the entire 3' end of the genome. It is essential in the initiation of replication. This paper reports the identification of a novel, strand-specific, long-range RNA-RNA interaction between the 5' and 3' ends of the genome, which involves 5BSL3.2 and IRES motifs. Mutants harboring substitutions in the apical loop of domain IIId or in the internal loop of 5BSL3.2 disrupt the complex, indicating these regions are essential in initiating the kissing interaction. No complex was formed when the UTRs of the related foot and mouth disease virus were used in binding assays, suggesting this interaction is specific for HCV sequences. The present data firmly suggest the existence of a higher-order structure that may mediate a protein-independent circularization of the HCV genome. The 5'-3' end bridge may have a role in viral translation modulation and in the switch from protein synthesis to RNA replication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据