4.4 Article

Variants in TNFSF4, TNFAIP3, TNIP1, BLK, SLC15A4 and UBE2L3 interact to confer risk of systemic lupus erythematosus in Chinese population

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 459-464

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-013-2864-3

关键词

Systemic lupus erythematosus; Interaction; SNP; GWAS

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB541901, 2012CB722404, 2011CB512103]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31000528, 81071940, 30972727, 81171505]
  3. Youth Science Training Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [2010kj10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our previous genome-wide association studies on SLE have identified several susceptibility genes involved in NF-kappa B signaling pathway, including TNFSF4, TNFAIP3, TNIP1, BLK, SLC15A4 and UBE2L3. The aim of this study is to investigate the association model (additive, dominant, recessive) of these genes and search for possible gene-gene interactions between them. In this study, we explored the association model of these six genes and search for possible gene-gene interactions based on identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among them by using logistic regression analysis in the combined sample of 4,199 cases and 8,255 controls. The most significant association evidence was observed under recessive model for all of these SNPs. Besides, significant interactions between these SNPs were observed in this study: the TNFSF4 and TNIP1 SNPs (P (adjusted) = 1.68E-10), the TNFSF4 and SLC15A4 SNPs (P (adjusted) = 3.55E-08), the TNFSF4 and UBE2L3 SNPs (P (adjusted) = 8.74E-13), the TNIP1 and BLK SNPs (P (adjusted) = 9.45E-10), the TNIP1 and UBE2L3 SNPs (P (adjusted) = 8.25E-11), the TNFAIP3 and UBE2L3 SNPs (P (adjusted) = 3.06E-14) and the BLK and SLC15A4 SNPs (P (adjusted) = 4.51E-12). These results may contribute to our understanding of SLE genetic interactions and account for the additional risk of certain patients to develop SLE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据