4.7 Article

High levels of natural killer cells are associated with response to tocilizumab in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 54, 期 4, 页码 601-608

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu363

关键词

regulatory T cells; natural killer cells; B cells; tocilizumab; anti-TNF drug; interleukin-6 inhibitor; perforin; granzyme

资金

  1. Roche-Chugai (France)
  2. French Society of Rheumatology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. We aimed to assess the effect of tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL-6 receptor inhibitor, on B, T, NK and NKT cells in patients with RA and to study the cell type predictors of remission. We also compared NK cells in patients with RA and in controls. Methods. RA patients included in the study met the 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria, were receiving stable doses of steroids and had not received rituximab in the previous year. Different B and T cell subsets, NK cells and NKT cells were assessed by flow cytometry along with perforin A and granzyme B to estimate NK cell cytotoxicity. Results. We included 92 RA patients, including 20 requiring TCZ treatment and 15 requiring anti-TNF drugs, and 25 controls. At baseline, the proportion of CD56(dim)CD16(+)CD3(-) NK cells was inversely correlated with the 28-joint DAS (DAS28). In TCZ-treated patients, the baseline proportion of CD3(-)CD56(+) NK cells was inversely correlated with the change in DAS28 at 3 months and the proportion was 3-fold greater for patients with DAS28 remission at 3 months than other patients. Change in the proportion of CD56(bri)CD16(-) NK cells was linearly correlated with change in the DAS28 at 3 months. The baseline proportion of NK cells did not predict change in disease activity at 3 months with anti-TNF therapy. The perforin content in NK cells increased with TCZ treatment. Conclusion. This study supports NK cell involvement in RA and in the TCZ mechanism of action. NK cells at baseline could be a predictive factor of TCZ response if results are confirmed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据