4.7 Article

Clinical characteristics and survival of Japanese patients with connective tissue disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension: a single-centre cohort

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 51, 期 10, 页码 1846-1854

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes140

关键词

pulmonary arterial hypertension; mixed connective tissue disease; systemic lupus erythematosus; scleroderma; anti-U1RNP antibody

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To clarify the characteristics, survival and predictors of mortality in Japanese patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) associated with CTD. Methods. This single-centre cohort study enrolled 70 consecutive patients with PAH-CTD who visited a tertiary referral centre in Japan between 1970 and 1990 (n = 30, historical group) and between 2000 and 2009 (n = 40, recent group). Baseline clinical features, haemodynamic parameters and ANA profiles were recorded. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine independent factors associated with an increased risk of mortality. Results. MCTD and SLE were the major underlying CTDs, comprising 43% and 29% of PAH patients respectively, whereas SSc was less common (19%). Anti-U1RNP antibody was the most prevalent ANA (61%). The cumulative survival rate was significantly better in the recent group in comparison with the historical group (76% vs 26% at 3 years; P < 0.001). When both groups were combined, World Health Organization functional class III or IV at diagnosis was identified as an independent predictor of mortality, whereas modern PAH drug use was associated with a favourable outcome. Conclusion. The major PAH-CTD population in Japan suffers from MCTD or SLE with anti-U1RNP antibody, in contrast to PAH-CTD patients in the USA and Europe. Modern PAH treatment has improved survival rates, but long-term outcomes are still unsatisfactory. Independent predictors of mortality indicate that early diagnosis and the prompt use of PAH drugs should improve survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据