4.7 Article

Central nervous system involvement in Sjogren's syndrome: unusual, but not unremarkable-clinical, serological characteristics and outcomes in a large cohort of Italian patients

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 49, 期 8, 页码 1540-1549

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq111

关键词

Primary Sjogren's syndrome; Neurological involvement; Central nervous system; Instrumental evaluation; Clinical findings; Extraglandular manifestations

资金

  1. Fondo Regione Emilia Romagna [PG 08 23943/2008/P18A]
  2. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Ferrara, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methods. A total of 424 pSS patients, diagnosed according to the 2002 criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group, were checked for CNS involvement after exclusion of secondary causes. Demographic, clinical, seroimmunological data were compared between patients with and without CNS involvement. Neuroimaging data were also analysed. Results. CNS involvement was detected in 25 (5.8%) patients (24 females and 1 male) both at disease onset (52%) and later (48%) with a mean latency after diagnosis of 7 years. Diffuse (40%), focal/multifocal (36%), multiple sclerosis (MS)-like disease (20%) and isolated optic neuritis (4%) were the most common CNS clinical pictures. Disease duration, lung involvement and decreased C-4 were associated with CNS involvement, while articular manifestations were more frequently observed in patients without neurological complications. Most cases had an acute, often recurrent course with spontaneous remission or only mild neurological impairment. Conclusions. CNS involvement represents a rare but not negligible complication of pSS, which may occur with a bimodal temporal pattern, both at onset and later, prompting attention in the differential diagnosis of apparently isolated neurological syndromes. Lung involvement emerged as the strongest risk factor for CNS involvement with a relative risk of 7.9, along with disease duration and decreased C-4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据