4.7 Article

Incidence of TNFRSF1A mutations in German children: epidemiological, clinical and genetic characteristics

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 48, 期 8, 页码 987-991

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep140

关键词

TNF receptor 1-associated periodic syndrome; Hereditary periodic fever; Autoinflammatory disease; ESPED; TNFRSF1A gene; Mutation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. TNF receptor 1-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) is a rare disease belonging to the heterogeneous group of hereditary periodic fever (HPF) syndromes. By their monogenic origins, the HPF syndromes are clearly differentiated from other periodic inflammatory episodes occurring in autoimmune, neoplastic and infectious diseases. We aim to determine the incidence of TRAPS and the spectrum of mutations in the TNFRSF1A gene, and to give a brief survey of clinical signs. Methods. A prospective surveillance of children with TRAPS was conducted in Germany during a time period of 3 years (2003-06). Monthly inquiries were sent to 370 children's hospitals by the German Pediatric Surveillance Unit (Clinic-ESPED, n1) and to 23 laboratories (Laboratory-ESPED, n2). Inclusion criteria were TNFRSF1A mutation-positive patients 416 years of age, more than three self-limiting episodes of fever >38.5 degrees C, and increased inflammation markers. Clinical, epidemiological and genetic data were evaluated via questionnaires. Results. Of the 23 cases included, 19 were identical in 20 clinical and 22 laboratory reports. The incidence of TRAPS in German children was estimated to be similar to 5.6 per 10(7) person-years. In 20 TRAPS patients of the Clinic-ESPED, median age of onset and duration of fever periods were 6 (range 1-16) years and 6.3 (range 2-24) days, respectively. Main symptoms were arthralgia, abdominal pain, lymphadenopathy, headache and skin involvement. The R92Q substitution was found in 19 (83%) of 23 cases. Conclusion. The incidence of TRAPS is low and corresponds to 6-10 newly diagnosed patients 416 years per year in Germany.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据