4.3 Article

An isocorydine derivative (d-ICD) inhibits drug resistance by downregulating IGF2BP3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 28, 页码 25149-25160

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4438

关键词

isocorydine; IGF2BP3; cancer stem cell; CD133; hepatocellular carcinoma

资金

  1. National Key Program for Basic Research of China (973) [2015CB553905]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272438, 81472726, 81301859]
  3. Key Discipline and Specialty Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning
  4. National KeySci-Tech Special Project of China [2013ZX10002-011]
  5. SKLORG Research foundation [91-12-04, 91-13-02, 91-14-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In our previous studies, we reported that CD133(+) cancer stem cells (CSCs) were chemoresistant in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and that isocorydine treatment decreased the percentage of CD133(+) CSCs. Here, we found that a derivative of isocorydine (d-ICD) inhibited HCC cell growth, particularly among the CD133(+) subpopulation, and rendered HCC cells more sensitive to sorafenib treatment. d-ICD inhibited IGF2BP3 expression in a time-dependent manner, and IGF2BP3 expression negatively correlated with d-ICD-induced growth suppression. IGF2BP3 overexpression enriched the CD133(+) CSC subpopulation in HCC, enhanced tumor sphere formation and suppressed the cytotoxic effects of sorafenib and doxorubicin. The expression of drug resistance-related genes, including ABCB1 and ABCG2, and the CSC marker CD133 expression was increased after IGF2BP3 overexpression. The significance of these observations was underscored by our findings that high IGF2BP3 expression predicted poor survival in a cohort of 236 patients with HCC and positively correlated with ABCG2 and CD133 expression in vivo. These results suggested that the d-ICD may inhibit HCC cells growth by IGF2BP3 decrease and that IGF2BP3 may serve as a therapeutic target for HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据