4.3 Article

Triple negative breast cancers comprise a highly tumorigenic cell subpopulation detectable by its high responsiveness to a Sox2 regulatory region 2 (SRR2) reporter

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 12, 页码 10366-10373

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3590

关键词

breast cancer; tumour cell heterogeneity; Sox2; SRR2

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation
  3. Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Scholarship
  4. CIHR Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships
  5. Alberta Cancer Foundation Cancer Research Postdoctoral Fellowship
  6. Taibah University, Al Madina Al Munawarrah, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have recently described a novel phenotypic dichotomy within estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells; the cell subset responsive to a Sox2 regulatory region (SRR2) reporter (RR cells) are significantly more tumorigenic than the reporter unresponsive (RU) cells. Here, we report that a similar phenomenon also exists in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), with RR cells more tumorigenic than RU cells. First, examination of all 3 TNBC cell lines stably infected with the SRR2 reporter revealed the presence of a cell subset exhibiting reporter activity. Second, RU and RR cells purified by flow cytometry showed that RR cells expressed higher levels of CD44, generated more spheres in a limiting dilution mammosphere formation assay, and formed larger and more complex structures in Matrigel. Third, within the CD44(High)/CD24(-) tumor-initiating cell population derived from MDA-MB-231, RR cells were significantly more tumorigenic than RU cells in an in vivo SCID/Beige xenograft mouse model. Examination of 4 TNBC tumors from patients also revealed the presence of a RR cell subset, ranging from 1.1-3.8%. To conclude, we described a novel phenotypic heterogeneity within TNBC, and the SRR2 reporter responsiveness is a useful marker for identifying a highly tumorigenic cell subset within the CD44(High)/CD24(-) tumor-initiating cell population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据