4.3 Article

Circulation long non-coding RNAs act as biomarkers for predicting tumorigenesis and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 4505-4515

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.2934

关键词

plasma; lncRNA; microarray; risk score function; ROC curve

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [81225017]
  2. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [81430062]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB910800]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation [81201528, 81201880]
  5. Priority Academic Program of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND & AIMS Alpha Fetal Protein (AFP) was one of the traditional biomarker for diagnosis of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) clinically, however, with the low specificity of AFP, the early diagnosis or the metastasis prediction of HCC is inferior. A new, minimally invasive and more specificity biomarker for the diagnosis or metastasis prediction of HCC are necessary. METHODS In this study, we applied an lncRNA microarray to screen the potential biomarker for HCC. The multi-stage validation and risk score formula detection was used for validation. RESULTS We discovered three lncRNA, RP11-160H22.5, XLOC_014172 and LOC149086, which were up-regulated in HCC comparing with the cancer-free controls with the merged area under curve (AUC) in training set and validation set of 0.999 and 0.896. Furthermore, XLOC_014172 and LOC149086 was confirmed highly increased in metastasis HCC patients with the merged AUC in training set and validation set of 0.900 and 0.934. Besides, most patients presented a decreased level of the three lncRNAs after operation, while the patients with secondary increased level might be associated with tumor hematogenous metastasis. CONCLUSIONS RP11-160H22.5, XLOC_014172 and LOC149086 might be the potential biomarker for the tumorigenesis prediction and XLOC_014172 and LOC149086 for metastasis prediction in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据