3.9 Article

Mild cognitive impairment (part 1): clinical characteristics and predictors of dementia

期刊

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 178-185

出版社

ASSOC BRASILEIRA PSIQUIATRIA
DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-3503

关键词

Mild cognitive impairment; dementia; Alzheimer's disease; biomarkers

资金

  1. Associacao Beneficiente Alzira Denise Hertzog da Silva (ABADHS)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [02/12633-7, 2009/52825-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To critically review and evaluate existing knowledge on the conceptual limits and clinical usefulness of the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and the neuropsychological assessment and short- and long-term prognosis thereof. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases, limited to articles published in English between 1999 and 2012. Based on the search terms mild cognitive impairment or MCI and epidemiology or diagnosis, we retrieved 1,698 articles, of which 248 were critically eligible (cross-sectional and longitudinal studies); the abstracts of the remaining 1,450 articles were also reviewed. Results: A critical review on the MCI construct is provided, including conceptual and diagnostic aspects; epidemiological relevance; clinical assessment; prognosis; and outcome. The distinct definitions of cognitive impairment, MCI included, yield clinically heterogeneous groups of individuals. Those who will eventually progress to dementia may present with symptoms consistent with the definition of MCI; conversely, individuals with MCI may remain stable or return to normal cognitive function. Conclusion: On clinical grounds, the cross-sectional diagnosis of MCI has limited prognostic relevance. The characterization of persistent and/or progressive cognitive deficits over time is a better approach for identification of cases at the pre-dementia stages, particularly if these cognitive abnormalities are consistent with the natural history of incipient Alzheimer's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据