4.5 Article

A highly modular beamline electrostatic levitation facility, optimized for in situ high-energy x-ray scattering studies of equilibrium and supercooled liquids

期刊

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
卷 82, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3554437

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-06-06065, DMR-08-56199]
  2. NASA [NNX09AJ19H, NNX07AK27G]
  3. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences [DS-AC02-07CH11358]
  4. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. NASA [116867, NNX09AJ19H] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [0856199] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-energy x-ray diffraction studies of metallic liquids provide valuable information about structural evolution on the atomic length scale, leading to insights into the origin of the nucleation barrier and the processes of supercooling and glass formation. The containerless processing of the beamline electrostatic levitation (BESL) facility allows coordinated thermophysical and structural studies of equilibrium and supercooled liquids to be made in a contamination-free, high-vacuum (similar to 10(-8) Torr) environment. To date, the incorporation of electrostatic levitation facilities into synchrotron beamlines has been difficult due to the large footprint of the apparatus and the difficulties associated with its transportation and implementation. Here, we describe a modular levitation facility that is optimized for diffraction studies of high-temperature liquids at high-energy synchrotron beamlines. The modular approach used in the apparatus design allows it to be easily transported and quickly setup. Unlike most previous electrostatic levitation facilities, BESL can be operated by a single user instead of a user team. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3554437]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据