4.4 Article

EFFECT OF FOCAL/GRID PHOTOCOAGULATION ON VISUAL ACUITY AND RETINAL THICKENING IN EYES WITH NON-CENTER-INVOLVED DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181a2c07a

关键词

diabetic macular edema; focal/grid laser photocoagulation

资金

  1. National Eye Institute
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [EY14231, EY14269, EY14229]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To report visual acuity and anatomic changes from baseline to 12 months after modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-style (focal/grid) photocoagulation in eyes with non-center-involved (non-Cl) clinically significant macular edema. Methods: Visual acuity, optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and fundus photography data were analyzed from eyes with non-Cl clinically significant macular edema treated with modified ETDRS-style (focal/grid) photocoagulation in a Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network trial. Results: Among the 22 eyes (of 22 patients) with 12-month follow-up, median visual acuity letter score remained within 1 letter of baseline over 12 months. The median central subfield retinal thickness decreased by 10 mu m, median total macular volume decreased by 0.2 mm(3), and median fluorescein leakage area within the grid decreased by 0.7 disk areas. Conclusion: We are unaware of any other systematic evaluation of eyes with non-Cl clinically significant macular edema since the ETDRS. Focal/grid laser in these non-Cl eyes was associated with relatively stable visual acuity and retinal thickness measurements, and decreased fluorescein leakage area at 1 year. One-year visual acuity results are consistent with those published by the ETDRS, despite the intervening significant differences in the management of diabetes. Although this was a small study without a concurrent control group, the ETDRS recommendation to consider focal/grid laser in eyes with non-Cl clinically significant macular edema still seems appropriate. RETINA 29:613-617, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据