4.2 Article

Breath-by-breath changes of lung oxygen stores at rest and during exercise in humans

期刊

RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 164, 期 3, 页码 291-299

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2008.06.002

关键词

Oxygen uptake; Kinetics; Breath-by-breath

资金

  1. Vrije University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When measuring breath-by-breath (BbB) oxygen uptake at the mouth (VMO2) as the difference between the amount of inspired and expired oxygen, BbB variation in lung oxygen stores due to BbB variation in end-expiratory lung volume (VLET) introduces an error leading to a decreased signal-to-noise ratio when compared to oxygen uptake at the alveolo-capillary interface (VA(O2)). Conventional BbB measurement of oxygen uptake does not measure BbB changes in lung oxygen stores. Opto-electronic plethysmography (OEP) allows accurate monitoring of absolute lung volume changes and BbB quantification of changes in pulmonary oxygen stores. To quantify BbB variation of lung oxygen stores and to assess variability in VMO2 due to BbB variation of lung oxygen stores, we measured, VMO2 and VA(O2) in parallel, at rest, during transients and during steady state cycling exercise at 60, 90 and 120 W in 7 healthy male subjects. Average VMO2 and VA(O2) at steady state were not different (p = 0.328). Direct measurement of VA(O2) reduced overall BbB variability by 24% (p < 0.0001) and variance of the difference between VMO2 and VA(O2) could be explained for 55% by BbB changes in VLET and expiratory oxygen fraction. VA(O2) was higher than VMO2 15 and 30 s after exercise onset (p < 0.01). We conclude that (1) by taking into account changes in lung oxygen stores BbB variability of oxygen uptake is reduced, (2) alveolar oxygen stores change rapidly during transients to exercise, and (3) changes in alveolar oxygen stores affect BbB oxygen uptake measured at the mouth during the cardio-dynamic phase 1. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据