4.5 Article

Exacerbations in subjects with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency receiving augmentation therapy

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 103, 期 10, 页码 1532-1539

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.04.008

关键词

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency; Lung diseases; Obstructive; Exacerbations; Health-related quality of life

资金

  1. AtphaNet, Inc.
  2. National Institute of Health [K01 HL084675]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The frequency, characteristics and impact of acute exacerbations in patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) and COPD who are on intravenous alpha-1 antitrypsin augmentation therapy have not been described. Methods: 922 subjects with AATD and COPD on augmentation therapy (mean age 54.5 years) were followed with monthly telephone surveys to record exacerbation characteristics, as well, as healthcare resource utilization and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Exacerbations were defined by symptom-based and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) criteria. Results: During the 1-year follow-up, 91.5% of participants experienced at least one exacerbation (mean 2.4 exacerbations per subject, median 2, and mean duration 17 days per episode, regardless of the definition used). Most exacerbations were categorized as severe by symptoms and moderate by HRU criteria. Subjects who had 3 or more exacerbations (48.6%) were younger, had higher medication use and had higher tobacco consumption compared with subjects with less exacerbations. Subjects with frequent exacerbations had the worst baseline HRQoL scores, as well as more physician visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations. Although most subjects received augmentation therapy on a weekly basis, other infusion schedules were more commonly observed in subjects with fewer exacerbations. Conclusion: COPD exacerbations occur frequently and are associated with significant disease burden in subjects with AATD receiving augmentation therapy. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据