4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Pretreatment with toll-like receptor 4 antagonist inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced preterm uterine contractility, cytokines, and prostaglandins in rhesus monkeys

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 121-127

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1933719107310992

关键词

toll-like receptor 4; intrauterine infection/inflammation; preterm labor; rhesus monkey; animal model

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P51-RR000163, P51 RR000163-486877, P51 RR000163] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI042490-03, K08 AI067910-01A1, AI067910, R01 AI042490, K08 AI067910, AI42490] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD006159-34, HD06159, K12 HD001264, R01 HD006159, HD01264, K12 HD001264-06] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intrauterine infection, which occurs in most early preterm births, triggers an immune response culminating in preterm labor. The authors hypothesize that blockade of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced immune responses by a toll-like receptor 4 antagonist (TLR4A) would prevent elevations in induced fluid (AF) cytokines, prostaglandins, and uterine contractility. Chronically, catheterized rhesus monkeys at 128 to 147 days' gestation received intra-amniotic infusions of either (1) saline (n = 6), (2) LPS (0.15- 10 mu g; n = 4), or (3) TLR4A pretreatment with LPS (10 mu g) 1 hour later (n = 4). AF cytokities, prostaglaudius, and uteriue contractility were compared using 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons. Compared with saline controls, LPS induced significant elevations in AF interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, PGE(2), PGF(2 alpha), and uterine contractility (P <.05). In contrast, TLR4A pretreatment inhibited LPS-induced uterine activity and was associated with significantly lower AF IL-8, TNF-alpha, PGE(2), and PGF(2 alpha), versus LPS alone (P <.05). Toll-like receptor antagonists, together with antibiotics, may delay or prevent infection-associated preterm birth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据