4.6 Article

Increased exposure to dioxin-like compounds is associated with endometriosis in a case-control study in women

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 681-688

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.01.018

关键词

case-control; dioxin-like compounds; DR-CALUX bioassay; endometriosis; environment

资金

  1. Endometriosis Association
  2. FWO (Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek/Foundation for Scientific Research, Vlaanderen)
  3. Onderzoeksraad KU Leuven (Leuven University Research Foundation)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although endometriosis is thought to be an environmental disorder initiated by dioxin exposure, this association is controversial. This study was performed to test the hypothesis that endometriosis occurs more often in women exposed to higher concentrations of dioxin-like compounds (DLC) than in those women exposed to lower concentrations. Plasma samples collected prior to laparoscopic surgery from 96 women with endometriosis and 106 control patients with a normal pelvis were measured for DLC concentrations using the dioxin-responsive chemical-activated luciferase expression bioassay. The results showed that concentration (mean +/- SD) of DLC was marginally higher in patients with endometriosis (22.3 +/- 9.3 pg CALUX-TEQ/g lipid) than in controls (20.5 +/- 10.8 pg). After categorization of patients in a group with 'low' plasma concentrations (<25th centile) and a group with 'high' plasma concentrations (>75th centile) of DLC, the age-adjusted odds ratio to have endometriosis was 2.44 (95% CI 1.04-5.70; P = 0.04) for women with high concentrations of DLC and it increased to 3.01 (95% Cl 1.06-9.04; P = 0.03) when only women with moderate severe endometriosis were considered. In conclusion, women exposed to higher plasma concentrations of DLC were at higher risk of having endometriosis than women exposed to lower concentrations of DLC within normal environmental concentrations. (C) 2010, Reproductive Health Care Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据