4.0 Review

A review of East Asian reports of aurorae and comets circa AD 775

期刊

ASTRONOMISCHE NACHRICHTEN
卷 336, 期 6, 页码 530-544

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asna.201512193

关键词

comets: general; history and philosophy of astronomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given that a strong C-14 variation in AD 775 has recently been suggested to be due to the largest solar flare ever recorded in history, it is relevant to investigate whether celestial events observed around that time may have been aurorae, possibly even very strong aurorae, or otherwise related to the C-14 variation (e.g. a suggested comet impact with Earth's atmosphere). We critically review several celestial observations from AD 757 to the end of the 770s, most of which were previously considered to be true, and in some cases, strong aurorae; we discuss in detail the East Asian records and their wording. We conclude that probably none among the events after AD 770 was actually an aurora, including the event in AD 776 Jan, which was misdated for AD 774 or 775; the observed white qi phenomenon that happened above the moon in the south-east was most probably a halo effect near the full Moon - too late in any case to be related to the C-14 variation in AD 774/5. There is another report of a similar (or identical) white qi phenomenon above the moon, reported just before a comet observation and dated to AD 776 Jan; the reported comet observed by the Chinese was misdated to AD 776, but actually sighted in AD 767. Our critical review of East Asian reports of aurorae circa AD 775 shows some very likely true Chinese auroral displays observed and reported for AD 762; there were also several events prior to AD 771 that may have been aurorae but are questionable. (C) 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据