4.4 Article

Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry analysis of long-chain oxidation products of cardiolipin induced by the hydroxyl radical

期刊

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 316-326

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.4866

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [PTDC/QUI-BIOQ/104968/2008, REDE/1504/REM/2005]
  2. COMPETE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anionic phospholipid cardiolipin (CL) is found almost exclusively in the inner membrane of mitochondria, playing an important role in energy metabolism. Oxidation of CL has been associated with apoptotic events and various pathologies. In this study, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry coupled with liquid chromatography (LC/ESI-MS) was used to identify tetralinoleoyl-cardiolipin (TLCL) modifications induced by the OH center dot radical generated under Fenton reaction conditions (H2O2 and Fe2+). The identified oxidation products of TLCL contained 2, 4, 6 and 8 additional oxygen atoms. These long-chain oxidation products were characterized by LC/ESI-MS/MS as doubly [M-2H](2-) and singly charged [M-H](-) ions. A detailed analysis of the fragmentation pathways of these precursor ions allowed the identification of hydroperoxy derivatives of CL. MS/MS analysis indicated that CL oxidation products with 4, 6 and 8 oxygen atoms have one fatty acyl chain bearing 4 oxygen atoms ([RCOOR4O](-)). Even when the TLCL molecule was oxidized by the addition of eight oxygen atoms, one of the acyl chains remained non-modified and one fatty acyl chain contained three or four oxygen atoms. This led us to conclude that under oxidative conditions by the OH center dot radical, the distribution of oxygens/peroxy groups in the CL molecule is not random, even when CL has the same fatty acyl chains in all the positions. Using mass spectrometry, the oxidation products have been unequivocally assigned, which may be useful for their detection in biological samples Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据