4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Carbon and hydrogen isotope fractionation of benzene during biodegradation under sulfate-reducing conditions: a laboratory to field site approach

期刊

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 23, 期 16, 页码 2439-2447

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.4049

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microbial carbon and hydrogen isotope fractionation of benzene under sulfate-reducing conditions was investigated within systems of increasing complexity: (i) batch laboratory microcosms, (ii) a groundwater-percolated column system, and (iii) an aquifer transect. Recent molecular biological studies indicate that, at least in the laboratory microcosms and the column system, benzene is degraded by similar bacterial communities. Carbon and hydrogen enrichment factors (epsilon(C), epsilon(H)) obtained from laboratory microcosms and from the column study varied significantly although experiments were performed under similar redox and temperature conditions. Thus, enrichment factors for only a single element could not be used to distinguish benzene degradation under sulfate-reducing conditions from other redox conditions. In contrast, using correlation of changes of hydrogen vs. carbon isotope ratios (Lambda = Delta delta H-2/Delta delta C-13), Similar A-values were derived for the benzene biodegradation under sulfate-reducing conditions in all three experimental systems (Lambda(laboratory) (microcosms) = 23 +/- 5, Lambda(column) = 28 +/- 31 Lambda(aquifer) = 24 +/- 2), showing the robustness of the two-dimensional compound-specific stable isotope analysis (2D-CSIA) for elucidating distinct biodegradation pathways. Comparing carbon and hydrogen isotope fractionation data from recent studies, an overlap in Lambda-values was observed for benzene biodegradation under sulfate-reducing (Lambda = 23 +/- 5 to A = 29 +/- 3) and methanogenic (Lambda = 28 +/- 1 to Lambda = 39 +/- 5) conditions, indicating a similar initial benzene reaction mechanism for both electron-acceptor conditions. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据