期刊
HUMAN FERTILITY
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 165-183出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14647273.2015.1083144
关键词
Elective single embryo transfer (eSET); multiple pregnancy; ART; IVF; ICSI; ACE; BFS; guidelines
资金
- Medical Research Council [MR/L020335/1, G0801057, G0300484, G0700092] Funding Source: Medline
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J021636/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- Medical Research Council [1543095] Funding Source: researchfish
- Wellbeing of Women [RG1442] Funding Source: researchfish
- BBSRC [BB/J021636/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- MRC [MR/L020335/1, G0801057, G0300484, G0700092] Funding Source: UKRI
A significant number of multiple pregnancies and births worldwide continue to occur following treatment with Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs). Whilst efforts have been made to increase the proportion of elective single embryo transfer (eSET) cycles, the multiple pregnancy rate or MPR remains at a level that most consider unacceptable given the associated clinical risks to mothers and babies, and the additional costs associated with neonatal care of premature and low birth weight babies. Northern Europe, Australia and Japan have continued to lead the way in the adoption of eSET. Randomised controlled trials or RCTs, meta-analyses and economic analyses support the implementation of an eSET policy, particularly in light of recent advances in ARTs. This paper provides a review of current evidence and an update to the eSET guidelines first published by Cutting et al. (2008) intended to assist ART clinics in the implementation of an effective eSET policy.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据