4.7 Article

Evaluation of early metabolic responses in rectal cancer during combined radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone: Sequential FDG-PET-CT findings

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 94, 期 2, 页码 151-155

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.033

关键词

Metabolic treatment response; Sequential FDG-PET-CT imaging; Rectal cancer; Combined radiochemotherapy; Radiotherapy alone

资金

  1. Siemens MI
  2. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate metabolic changes of rectal tumors after 1 week of treatment of either radiochemotherapy (28 x 1.8 Gy + Capecitabine) (RCT) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (5 x 5 Gy) alone (RT). Materials and methods: Fourty-six rectal cancer patients, 25 RCT- and 21 RT-patients, were included in this study. Sequential FDG-PET-CT scans were performed for each of the included patients both prior to treatment and after the first week of treatment. Consecutively, the metabolic treatment response of the tumor was evaluated. Results: For the patients referred for pre-operative RCT, significant reductions of SUV(mean) (p < 0.001) and SUV(max) (p < 0.001) within the tumor were found already after the first week of treatment (8 Gy biological equivalent dose (BED). In contrast, 1 week of treatment with RT alone did not result in significant changes in the metabolic activity of the tumor (p = 0.767, p = 0.434), despite the higher applied RT close of 38.7 Gy BED. Conclusions: Radiochemotherapy of rectal cancer leads to significant early changes in the metabolic activity of the tumor, which was not the case early after hypofractionated radiotherapy alone, despite the higher radiotherapy dose given. Thus, the chemotherapeutic agent Capecitabine might be responsible for the early metabolic treatment responses during radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 94 (2010) 151-155

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据