4.6 Article

Radiation chemistry of salicylic and methyl substituted salicylic acids: Models for the radiation chemistry of pharmaceutical compounds

期刊

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 93-98

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.06.007

关键词

Pulse radiolysis; Methyl substituted salicylates; Hydroxyl radicals; Hydrated electron; Irradiation; Transient absorption spectra

资金

  1. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-1034555]
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1034555] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salicylic acid and its derivatives are components of many medications and moieties found in numerous pharmaceutical compounds. They have been used as models for various pharmaceutical compounds in pharmacological studies, for the treatment of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), and, reactions with natural organic matter (NOM). In this study, the radiation chemistry of benzoic acid, salicylic acid and four methyl substituted salicylic acids (MSA) is reported. The absolute bimolecular reaction rate constants for hydroxyl radical reaction with benzoic and salicylic acids as well as 3-methyl-, 4-methyl-, 5-methyl-, and 6-methyl-salicylic acid were determined (5.86 +/- 0.54) x 10(9), (1.07 +/- 0.07) x 10(10), (7.48 +/- 0.17) x 10(9), (731 +/- 0.29) x 10(9), (5.47 +/- 025) x 10(9), (6.94 +/- 0.10) x 10(9) (M-1 s(-1)), respectively. The hydrated electron reaction rate constants were measured (3.02 +/- 0.10) x 10(9), (8.98 +/- 027) x 10(9), (5.39 +/- 0.21) x 10(9), (433 +/- 0.17) x 10(9), (4.72 +/- 0.15) x 10(9), (1.42 +/- 0.02) x 10(9) (M-1 s(-1)), respectively. The transient absorption spectra for the six model compounds were examined and their role as model compounds for the radiation chemistry of pharmaceuticals investigated. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据