4.7 Article

Sensitivity of temperate vegetation to Holocene development of East Asian monsoon

期刊

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 126-134

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.06.006

关键词

Vegetation sensitivity; Forest-steppe ecotone; East Asian monsoon; Ecological niche; Migration; Holocene

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41325002, 31321061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estimating vegetation sensitivity during the Holocene will improve the predictions of future vegetation dynamics. We compiled 52 pollen sequences from the monsoon-influenced northern China to reconstruct the Holocene dynamics of three forest types dominated respectively by Pinus, Quercus and Betula, as well as steppe and desert indicated respectively by Artemisia and Chenopodiaceae. The sensitivities of these vegetation types to changes in intensity of the East Asian monsoon were calculated according to the elevation, temperature and precipitation groupings of sites. Our results show that the Holocene vegetation dynamics differed across vegetation types, with Pinus and Quercus at lower elevations more sensitive to monsoon-induced precipitation changes and Betula at higher elevations more sensitive to temperature changes at the beginning of the Holocene. We also found an increasing sensitivity for forests and steppe within different groups following evident reduction in monsoon intensity since 5 ka BP, caused most probably by climate drying in this drought-determined forest-steppe in northern China. Besides regional scale forest retreat caused by climate drying, elevational movement as well as site expansion and decline are also suggested to explain low vegetation sensitivities in some site-groups. Our study provides insights into the mechanisms of individualistic responses of plant taxa as well as the asymmetrical response of ecotonal vegetation to the Holocene monsoon development in China. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据