4.7 Article

Antarctic temperature changes during the last millennium: evaluation of simulations and reconstructions

期刊

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 75-90

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.09.003

关键词

Last millennium; Antarctica; Model-data comparison; Data assimilation; Reconstruction

资金

  1. F.R.S.- FNRS
  2. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (Research Program on Science for a Sustainable Development)
  3. French ANR VANISH
  4. European Union's Seventh Framework programme (FP7) [243908]
  5. Fond de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (FRS-FNRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temperature changes in Antarctica over the last millennium are investigated using proxy records, a set of simulations driven by natural and anthropogenic forcings and one simulation with data assimilation. Over Antarctica, a long term cooling trend in annual mean is simulated during the period 1000-1850. The main contributor to this cooling trend is the volcanic forcing, astronomical forcing playing a dominant role at seasonal timescale. Since 1850, all the models produce an Antarctic warming in response to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations. We present a composite of Antarctic temperature, calculated by averaging seven temperature records derived from isotope measurements in ice cores. This simple approach is supported by the coherency displayed between model results at these data grid points and Antarctic mean temperature. The composite shows a weak multi-centennial cooling trend during the pre-industrial period and a warming after 1850 that is broadly consistent with model results. In both data and simulations, large regional variations are superimposed on this common signal, at decadal to centennial timescales. The model results appear spatially more consistent than ice core records. We conclude that more records are needed to resolve the complex spatial distribution of Antarctic temperature variations during the last millennium. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据