4.2 Article

Climate and local controls of long-term vegetation dynamics in northern Patagonia (Lat 41°S)

期刊

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
卷 78, 期 3, 页码 502-512

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2012.07.004

关键词

Patagonia; Holocene climate; Vegetation and fire history; Charcoal; Pollen; Forest/steppe ecotone; Paleoecology

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ATM-0714061]
  2. LacCore visiting graduate student award
  3. Office Of The Director
  4. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [966472] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patagonian vegetation has dramatically changed in composition and distribution over the last 16,000 yr. Although patterns of vegetation change are relatively clear, our understanding of the processes that produce them is limited. High-resolution pollen and charcoal records from two lakes located at lat 41 degrees S provide new information on the postglacial history of vegetation and fire activity at the forest-steppe ecotone, and help clarify the relative importance of local and regional drivers of late-Holocene ecological change. Our results suggest that late-glacial parkland was colonized by shrubs at ca. 11,200 cal yr BP and this vegetation persisted until 4900 cal yr BP, when increased humidity allowed for the establishment of Nothofagus forest. The late Holocene is characterized by oscillations in forest dominance largely driven by changes in humidity, possibly associated with the onset or strengthening of ENSO. In the last 4900 yr, humid periods (4900-3800 and 2850-1350 cal yr BP) have promoted Nothofagus forest, whereas drier times (3800-2850 and 1350-450 cal yr BP) have favored Austrocedrus expansion. At intermediate moisture levels, however, the lower forest supported both taxa, and fire became an important control of community composition, with severe, infrequent fires facilitating Nothofagus regeneration and high fire frequency and intensity supporting Austrocedrus. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of University of Washington.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据