4.2 Article

Single-grain OSL dating of glaciofluvial quartz constrains Reid glaciation in NW Canada to MIS 6

期刊

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 305-316

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2011.11.009

关键词

Reid glaciation; OSL dating; Single-grain; Glacial deposits; Cordilleran Ice Sheet; Beringia; Ash Bend

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0558446]
  2. University of Wollongong
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council
  4. European Community [PIRG08-GA-2010-276810]
  5. Australian Research Council [DP0558446] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improved chronological control on the penultimate advance of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet in northwest Canada (the Reid glaciation) is required for a better understanding of late Quaternary palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental change in eastern Beringia. However, reliable dating of glaciation events beyond the last glacial maximum is commonly hindered by a lack of directly dateable material. In this study we (i) provide the first combined minimum and maximum age constraint on the Reid glaciation at Ash Bend, its reference locale in the Stewart River valley, northwestern Canadian Cordillera, using single-grain optically stimulated luminescence dating of quartz; and (ii) compare the timing of the Reid glaciation with other penultimate ice sheet advances in the region with the aim of establishing improved glacial reconstructions in eastern Beringia. We obtain ages of 158 +/- 18 ka and 132 +/- 18 ka for glaciofluvial sands overlying and underlying the Reid till, respectively. These ages indicate that the Reid advance, at its reference locale, occurred during MIS 6. This precludes an earlier MIS 8 age, and suggests that the Reid advance may have been synchronous with the Delta glaciation of central Alaska, and is likely correlative with the Mirror Creek glaciation in southern Yukon. (C) 2011 University of Washington. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据