4.2 Article

Can pollution bias peatland paleoclimate reconstruction?

期刊

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
卷 78, 期 2, 页码 170-173

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2012.05.004

关键词

Climate; Holocene; Testate amoebae; Nitrogen; Phosphorus; Ozone; Sulphur; Lead; Transfer function; Biological proxy

资金

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council through the BiodivERsA project PEATBOG
  2. Conseil Regional de Franche-Comte
  3. Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South: Research Partnerships for Mitigating Syndromes of Global Change
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (Postdoctoral Fellowship) [81NE-62574]
  5. NERC [NE/G002363/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G002363/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peatland testate amoebae are widely used to reconstruct paleohydrological/climatic changes, but many species are also known to respond to pollutants. Peatlands around the world have been exposed to anthropogenic and intermittent natural pollution through the late Holocene. This raises the question: can pollution lead to changes in the testate amoeba paleoecological record that could be erroneously interpreted as a climatic change? To address this issue we applied testate amoeba transfer functions to the results of experiments adding pollutants (N, P, S, Pb, O-3) to peatlands and similar ecosystems. We found a significant effect in only one case, an experiment in which N and P were added, suggesting that pollution-induced biases are limited. However, we caution researchers to be aware of this possibility when interpreting paleoecological records. Studies characterising the paleoecological response to pollution allow pollution impacts to be tracked and distinguished from climate change. (c) 2012 University of Washington. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据