4.4 Article

Stable isotope composition of bulk and secondary carbonates from the Quaternary loess-paleosol sequence in Sutto, Hungary

期刊

QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL
卷 319, 期 -, 页码 38-49

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.06.038

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) [50024670]
  2. Hungarian Research Fund [OTKA K68219]
  3. DAAD [P-MOB/844]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stable carbon and oxygen isotope composition of pedogenic carbonates were studied from the Quaternary loess-paleosol sequence of Sutto in Hungary to investigate genetic processes in a paleoenvironmental context and to distinguish subtypes. Bulk carbonate samples taken at 2 cm vertical resolution, and microscale secondary (authigenic) carbonates (calcified root cells, carbonate coatings, hypocoatings, and earthworm biospheroids) and concretions at 10 cm resolution were analysed to interpret stable isotope variations. Isotope values of bulk samples were in the range of 2.6 parts per thousand to -13.9 parts per thousand and -2.3 parts per thousand to 17.0 parts per thousand (vs. VPDB) for delta C-13 and delta O-18, respectively. The isotope compositions of secondary carbonates clearly distinguished between the organically related and inorganic (direct) precipitation of the different subtypes. In general, secondary carbonates showed more depleted values than bulk samples. Calcified root cells have the most depleted isotope composition with mean values of -16.0 parts per thousand and -11.8 parts per thousand for delta C-13 and 8180, respectively. Results indicate that loess and paleosol secondary carbonates reveal pedogenetic information during the different climatic phases. Carbon and oxygen isotope analyses are valuable to classify secondary carbonates and to serve as proxies for the interpretation of paleoenvironmental conditions, e.g. moisture conditions, leaching, the role of organic matter or vegetation. Secondary carbonates are more reliable than bulk samples because of their direct connection to the host strata. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据