4.4 Article

Obliquity forcing of Quaternary glaciation and environmental changes in NE Siberia

期刊

QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL
卷 234, 期 -, 页码 133-145

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.04.016

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [Ze 154/52-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reconstructing Quaternary glacial and environmental changes in the vast, high-northern latitudes of Siberia is essential for a better understanding of global past climate variability and its potential solar forcings. Two sediment outcrops in the Dyanushka Valley in the southwestern foreland of the Verkhoyansk Mountains, northeast Siberia, were investigated using a multi-proxy approach (lithostratigraphy, geochemistry, palynology, and radiocarbon and IRSL dating). Three piedmont glaciations reached the outcrop sites. The glacial advances are dated to > 140, similar to 119-92 and similar to 78-53 ka and thus, within dating uncertainties, correspond to obliquity minima during marine isotope stages (MIS) 6, 5d, and 4. This chronology corroborates and refines previous studies that have documented the successively more restricted glacial extents in Siberia during the course of the last glacial cycle. The observed glaciation pattern is out of phase with global ice volume estimates and probably indicates a strong aridisation trend. Additionally, the results show that the geochemical and mineralogical composition of the sediments contains information about provenance. Sediments originating from the Verkhoyansk Mountains are generally enriched in TiO2, MgO, P2O5, Fe2O3, Cr, illite, and chlorite, whereas sediments derived from the Lena River contain more expandable clay minerals, Ba, Sr. Alkane patterns as biomarker proxies turn out to be particularly valuable where poor preservation of pollen is an issue, and, generally speaking, vegetation reconstruction helps distinguishing between 'warm versus cold mode' sediments. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据