4.6 Article

Catalytic behaviors of Ni/γ-Al2O3 and Co/γ-Al2O3 during the hydrodeoxygenation of palm oil

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 3693-3705

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cy00425j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC)
  2. NSTDA, Thailand
  3. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) [RSA5580055]
  4. Thailand Graduate Institute of Science and Technology (TGIST) [TG-55-09-54-004D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The deactivation and regeneration behaviors of Ni/gamma-Al2O3 and Co/gamma-Al2O3 catalysts in the hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of palm oil were investigated at 573 K and 5 MPa in a trickle bed reactor. The catalysts were prereduced at 773 K for 3 h before the HDO experiments. The catalysts exhibited good catalytic activity (>90% yield) and remained stable for 100 h on-stream. Nevertheless, after 150 h onstream, the product yield gradually decreased from 92.2 to 76.2% over the Ni catalyst and dramatically declined from 88.6% to ca. 56.6% over the Co catalyst. The combined decarbonylation and/or decarboxylation (DCOx) reactions were dominant over the HDO reaction when the reaction was catalyzed by the Ni catalyst. Meanwhile, the contribution of DCOx and HDO reactions was nearly comparable over the Co catalyst. The XRD and XANES analyses confirmed the partial formation of metallic nickel or cobalt after prereduction and the further in situ reduction during the HDO experiments, suggesting the coexistence of the metal and metal oxides on the catalyst surfaces. The XRD and TEM analyses revealed some sintering of the nickel and cobalt particles during the time course of reaction. Based on the TPO analysis, the carbon deposition rate on the cobalt catalyst was faster than that on the nickel catalyst and would be the major reason for the catalyst deactivation, and the sintering was the minor one. Additionally, the regeneration under air at 773 K followed by reduction in H-2 at 773 K can completely restore the catalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据