4.7 Article

Intratumoral Heterogeneity in a Trp53-Null Mouse Model of Human Breast Cancer

期刊

CANCER DISCOVERY
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 520-533

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-1101

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH/NCI Pathway to Independence (PI) Award [CA142898]
  2. BCM Cancer Center [CA125123]
  3. NCI [CA148761, CA016303]
  4. NCI Breast SPORE program [P50-CA058223]
  5. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  6. Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center grant [CA125123]
  7. [P30CA047904]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intratumoral heterogeneity correlates with clinical outcome and reflects the cellular complexity and dynamics within a tumor. Such heterogeneity is thought to contribute to radio-and chemoresistance because many treatments may target only certain tumor cell subpopulations. A better understanding of the functional interactions between various subpopulations of cells, therefore, may help in the development of effective cancer treatments. We identified a unique subpopulation of tumor cells expressing mesenchymal-like markers in a Trp53-null mouse model of basal-like breast cancer using fluorescence-activated cell sorting and microarray analysis. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments revealed the existence of cross-talk between these mesenchymal-like cells and tumor-initiating cells. Knockdown of genes encoding ligands upregulated in the mesenchymal cells and their corresponding receptors in the tumor-initiating cells resulted in reduced tumorigenicity and increased tumor latency. These studies illustrate the non-cell-autonomous properties and importance of cooperativity between tumor subpopulations. SIGNIFICANCE: Intratumoral heterogeneity has been considered one important factor in assessing a patient's initial response to treatment and selecting drug regimens to effectively increase tumor response rate. Elucidating the functional interactions between various subpopulations of tumor cells will help provide important new insights in understanding treatment response and tumor progression. (C) 2015 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据