4.3 Article

Nutrition labelling of pre-packaged foods in Belgrade, Serbia: current situation

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 18, 期 11, 页码 1969-1978

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980014002353

关键词

Labelling; Nutrition information; Pre-packaged food

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science, Serbia [OI 175067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the presence of nutrition labels on pre-packaged food products, as well as to analyse the types of presentation. Design: This was a descriptive study. The following characteristics were analysed: (i) presence and placement of the nutrition declaration (either as front-of-pack (FOP) or back-of-pack (BOP)); (ii) content of the presented information; (iii) presence of nutrition and health claims; and (iv) legibility of the written information. Settings: Three different types of retailers in Belgrade, Serbia. Subjects: A total of 2138 pre-packaged food products from ten categories. Results: A nutrition declaration was found on 65.9 % of all tested products. It was displayed on the back of the packaging of 62.7 % of products and on the front of the packaging of 19.1 % of products. BOP was the most commonly observed in breakfast cereals, soft drinks, milk and instant soups (in total over 90 %), and the least common in meat products (21.5 %). FOP was predominantly displayed on breakfast cereals (65.0 %) and the least frequently on milk products (2.4 %). The 'Big 4' (energy value, protein, carbohydrate and fat contents) and the 'Big 4 with additional information' figured on 40.9 % of products. The 'Big 8' ('Big 4' plus sugar, saturated fat, fibre and sodium contents) and the 'Big 8 with additional information' were present less frequently (20.5 %). Nutrition claims and health claims appeared on very few products (6.6 % and 6.3 %, respectively). The proportion of products with insufficient legibility was 31.5%. Conclusions: Nutrition labelling in Belgrade, Serbia is not satisfactory. Mandatory regulations may be the best way to improve the current situation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据