4.3 Article

Characterizing lunch meals served and consumed by pre-school children in Head Start

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 2169-2177

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013001377

关键词

Lunch meals; Meal consumption; Pre-school children; Head Start

资金

  1. US Department of Agriculture (USDA)/Agricultural Research Service (ARS) [58-6250-6-003]
  2. National Cancer Institute [5 R01 CA-107545]
  3. USDA Hatch Project [LAB 93951]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the variability of food portions served and consumed by African-American and Hispanic-American pre-school children attending Head Start. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Food consumption by pre-schoolers (n 796) enrolled in sixteen Head Start centres in Houston, Texas (51% boys, 42% African-American, mean age 4 years) were assessed during 3 d of lunch meals using digital photography. Descriptive statistics and multilevel regression models, adjusting for classroom and school clustering effects, were determined. Subjects: Head Start pre-schoolers aged 3-5 years. Results: Mean amount served was 2428 kJ (580 kcal) and 572 g. Mean intake was 1421 kJ (339 kcal) and 331 g: 20% protein, 46% carbohydrate and 34% fat. Plate waste was 43% (range: 38% (fruit) to 61% (vegetables)). Mean CV of food served was 29%: 33% for entrees, 44% for vegetables, 60% for fruit and 76% for starches. Mean CV of food consumed was 46%: 58% for entrees, 86% for fruit, 96% for vegetables and 111% for starches. Total gram amount of food served was positively correlated with consumption (r = 0.43, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Plate waste and variation in amounts served and consumed were substantial; amounts served were associated with amounts consumed. Large portion sizes may contribute to paediatric obesity by promoting excessive intake at meals. Understanding factors influencing portion sizes provides insight about specific intervention strategies that can be used in obesity prevention programmes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据