4.3 Article

Evaluation of the first phase of a specialist weight management programme in the UK National Health Service: prospective cohort study

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 28-38

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011001625

关键词

Obesity; Overweight; Secondary prevention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the first phase of a specialist weight management: programme provided entirely within the UK National Health Service. Design: Prospective cohort study using multiple logistic regression analysis to report odds of >= 5 kg weight loss in all referrals and completers, and odds of completion, with 95% confidence intervals. Anxiety and depression 'caseness' were measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Setting: Glasgow and Clyde Weight Management Service (GCWMS) is a specialist multidisciplinary service, with clinical psychology support, for patients with BMI >= 35 kg/m(2) or BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) with co-morbidities. Subjects: All patients referred to GCWMS between 2004 and 2006. Results: Of 2976 patients referred to GCWMS, 2156 (72.4%) opted into the service and 809 completed phase 1. Among 809 completers, 35.5% (n 287) lost >= 5 kg. Age >= 40 years, male sex (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.05, 1.82), >= 50 kg/m(2) (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.14, 2.54) and depression (OR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.35, 2.44) increased the likelihood of losing >= 5 kg. Diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.55, 95% Cl 0.38, 0.81) and socio-economic deprivation were associated with poorer outcomes. Success in patients aged >= 40 years and with BMI >= 50 kg/m(2) was associated with higher completion rates of the programme. Patients from the most deprived areas were less likely to lose >= 5 kg because of non-completion of the programme. Conclusions: Further improvements in overall effectiveness might be achieved through targeting improvements in appropriateness of referrals, retention and effective interventions at specific populations of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据