4.3 Article

Lower Healthy Eating Index-2005 dietary quality scores in older women with rheumatoid arthritis v. healthy controls

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 1170-1177

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S136898001000008X

关键词

Healthy Eating Index-2005; Dietary quality; Rheumatoid arthritis; Women

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the dietary quality of older women with and without rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HET-2005) to identify potential strategies to improve the nutritional status. Design: Cross-sectional. Diet was assessed using 7 d food records and analysed for nutrient composition (Food Processor v. 7.11). Diet quality was determined using the HEI-2005, a measure of compliance with 2005 US Dietary Guidelines. Individuals with RA completed a self-reported evaluation of arthritis (pain scale and disability index). Independent two-tailed t tests or Mann Whitney tests compared the differences between groups and correlations were computed between HEI-2005 and measures of disease reactivity. Setting: Arizona, USA. Subjects: Older 55 years) women (n 108) with RA (17 52) and healthy controls (HC; n 56). Results: There were no differences between groups in age, weight, or BMI (kg/m(2)). HC participants had higher mean HEI-2005 scores for whole fruit (cups; P=0.02), total fruit (cups; P=0.05), whole grains (oz; P=0.004), oil (g; P=0.05) and total HEI score (P=0.04) than the RA group. In the RA group, these same HET components were inversely correlated with disability index (r= - 0.20, P = 0.04). Participants with RA reported lower mean intakes of carbohydrate (g; P = 0.02), fibre (g; P = 0.01) and vitamin C (mg; P=0.04). Conclusions: This is the first study examining the dietary quality in older women with and without RA using the HEI-2005. Living with RA was associated with significantly lower dimly quality. Since even small changes in dietary quality can translate into better nutritional status, future interventions should focus on increasing dietary quality in this high-risk group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据