期刊
PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 1157-1164出版社
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980008004382
关键词
Review; Low income; Strengths; Weaknesses; Dietary survey
资金
- Food Standards Agency
In 1998, a review for the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food (the predecessor of the Food Standards Agency) Was published evaluating the relative merits of different dietary assessment methods against a series of factors likely to affect compliance or accuracy in low-income households. The review informed the design of a method comparison stud), carried out in London, UK, in 2001, in which the validity and acceptability of 4d dietary assessment methods based on 24h recalls, food checklists and a semi-weighed method were compared with 4d weighed inventories and other reference Measures. Results were based on observations in 384 respondents (159 males, 225 females) aged 2-90 years in 240 households. Outcomes of the comparison study included evaluations of each method made by respondents, interviewers and researchers. These findings were used in the present paper to Update and extend the 1998 review. Additional factors not included in the 1998 review have been considered. This updated and extended review provides the basis for discussion of the relative merits, of approaches to dietary assessment in low-income households in developed economies. The evidence presented here and elsewhere Suggests that the 24 h recall is the method best suited for dietary assessment in low-income households, followed by the weighed inventory, food checklist and lastly the semi-weighed method.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据