4.4 Article

Improved cognition without adverse effects: novel M1 muscarinic potentiator compares favorably to donepezil and xanomeline in rhesus monkey

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 232, 期 11, 页码 1859-1866

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-014-3813-x

关键词

Alzheimer's; Acetylcholinesterase; Muscarinic; M1; Cognition; Side-effects; Donepezil; Xanomeline

资金

  1. Merck Co., Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The standards of care for Alzheimer's disease, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil (AriceptA (R)), are dose-limited due to adverse side-effects. These adverse events lead to significant patient non-compliance, constraining the dose and magnitude of efficacy that can be achieved. Non-selective muscarinic receptor orthosteric agonists such as Xanomeline have been shown to be effective in treating symptoms as well, but were also poorly tolerated. Therefore, there is an unmet medical need for a symptomatic treatment that improves symptoms and is better tolerated. We compared donepezil, xanomeline, and the novel selective muscarinic 1 receptor positive allosteric modulator PQCA in combination with donepezil in the object retrieval detour (ORD) cognition test in rhesus macaque. Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects (salivation and feces output) were then assessed with all compounds to determine therapeutic window. All three compounds significantly reduced a scopolamine-induced deficit in ORD. Consistent with what is observed clinically in patients, both donepezil and xanomeline produced significant GI effects in rhesus at doses equal to or less than a fivefold margin from the minimum effective dose that improves cognition. In stark contrast, PQCA produced no GI side effects when tested at the same dose range. These data suggest M1 positive allosteric modulators have the potential to improve cognition in Alzheimer's disease with a greater therapeutic margin than the current standard of care, addressing an important unmet medical need.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据