4.4 Article

Clomipramine, but not haloperidol or aripiprazole, inhibits quinpirole-induced water contrafreeloading, a putative animal model of compulsive behavior

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 218, 期 4, 页码 749-759

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-011-2372-7

关键词

Contrafreeloading; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Quinpirole; Haloperidol; Clomipramine; Aripiprazole

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale Repeated administrations of the D2/D3 agonist quinpirole (QNP) to rats elicit an antieconomical pattern of drinking called contrafreeloading (CFL), a putative model of compulsive-like behavior. Objectives We tested the sensitivity of QNP-induced CFL to haloperidol (HAL), aripiprazole (ARI), and clomipramine (CIM), the latter proven effective in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Methods Rats were trained under a schedule of reinforcement (FR3) for water. On days 1-6, water was only available through lever pressing. On days 7-15, a choice between operant and free access was provided. QNP 0.5 mg/kg was administered alone or in combination with HAL (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg), ARI (0.3 or 1 mg/kg), or CIM (5 or 10 mg/kg). Results Acutely QNP suppressed operant behavior and, therefore, water intake; upon repeated administrations, tolerance developed to this suppressant effect on responding but only to a lesser extent to the antidipsic effect. In choice conditions, QNP induced a progressive preference for the operant access (CFL). HAL per se, but not CIM and ARI, significantly reduced both responding and drinking (operant phase). In the choice phase, HAL and CIM inhibited CFL, but only the latter reinstated total water intake. ARI, in combination with QNP, increased responding. Conclusions CIM reinstates control patterns of drinking, while HAL and ARI where partially or not effective at all, respectively. As far as CIM is considered a first line treatment in OCD, these results further strengthen the notion that QNP-induced CFL belongs to the realm of dopaminergic drug-induced compulsive behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据