4.4 Article

Orexins in the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus mediate anxiety-like responses in rats

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 212, 期 2, 页码 251-265

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-010-1948-y

关键词

Orexins; Hypocretins; Arousal; Midline thalamus; Anxiety; Kappa; CRF

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP68909]
  2. National Basic Research Program
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [2009CB522002, KSCXI-TW-R-68]
  4. NSFC
  5. Institute of Psychology, CAS [30600184, 07CX081008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anatomical studies have shown that the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT) innervates areas of the forebrain involved in the expression and regulation of emotional behaviors including fear and anxiety. In addition, the PVT is densely innervated by fibers containing orexin-A (OXA) and orexin-B (OXB), peptides that are well-known for their arousal effects on behavior. In this study, we investigate whether microinjections of orexin receptor agonists and antagonists in the PVT region alter expression of anxiety-like behaviors in the rat as measured in the elevated plus maze. We report that microinjections of OXA and OXB in the PVT region elicited anxiety-like response as indicated by a reduction in open arm time and entries. In addition, OXA and OXB produced changes in ethological measures indicative of an anxiety state. Central administrations of antagonists for corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) or the opioid kappa receptors attenuated the anxiogenic effects produced by microinjections of OXA in the PVT region. We also provide evidence that endogenously released orexins act at the PVT to produce anxiety by showing that microinjections of TCSOX229, an orexin-2 receptor antagonist, in the PVT region attenuated the anxiogenic effects produced by a previous exposure to footshock stress. This study indicates that endogenously released orexins act on the PVT to regulate anxiety levels through mechanisms involving the brain kappa and CRF receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据