4.4 Article

Extrasynaptic GABAA receptor activation reverses recognition memory deficits in an animal model of schizophrenia

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 214, 期 2, 页码 403-413

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-010-2039-9

关键词

Cognition; Gaba; Gaba receptor; Object recognition; Phencyclidine; Rat; Schizophrenia

资金

  1. H. Lundbeck A/S
  2. Drug Research Academy, Pharmaceutical Faculty, University of Copenhagen
  3. Oticon foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schizophrenia is a complex psychiatric disorder comprised of three main classes of symptoms: positive, negative and cognitive symptoms. Currently, no approved treatment exists for the cognitive symptoms. There is thus a great need for research aiming at identifying novel targets for treatment of this indication. Several neurotransmitter systems are affected in schizophrenia patients, including the gamma-amino butyric acid (GABAergic) system, demonstrated by reduced parvalbumin-containing interneurons, glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) and the GABA transporter GAT-1. Furthermore, gene expression of several GABA(A) receptor sub-units, such as alpha 1, alpha 4 and delta is reduced in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of schizophrenia patients. The psychotomimetic NMDA receptor antagonist phencyclidine (PCP) is frequently employed to model schizophrenia in animal disease models. Sub-chronic PCP treatment of female hooded Lister rats has repeatedly been shown to induce impairments in object recognition memory, and this model was therefore chosen for the examination of the potential of positive modulation of extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors in alleviating the PCP-induced deficit. Rats treated sub-chronically with PCP showed significant impairments in recognition memory. This deficit was reversed by positive modulation of extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors. The present study shows that extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors may present a novel target for the development of therapeutics aimed at improving cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据