4.6 Review

A Meta-Analytic Review of Achievement Goal Measures: Different Labels for the Same Constructs or Different Constructs With Similar Labels?

期刊

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
卷 136, 期 3, 页码 422-449

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0018947

关键词

achievement goals; meta-analysis; motivation; interest; performance

资金

  1. U.S Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences [R305C050055, R305B050029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This meta-analysis addresses whether achievement goal researchers are using different labels for the same constructs or putting the same labels on different constructs We systematically examined whether conceptual and methodological differences in the measurement of achievement goals moderated achievement goal intercorrelations and relationships with outcomes We reviewed 243 correlational studies of self-reported achievement goals comprising a total of 91,087 participants The items used to measure achievement goals were coded as being goal relevant (future-focused, cognitively represented, competence-related end states that the individual approaches or avoids) and were categorized according to the different conceptual definitions found within the literature. The results indicated that achievement goal outcome and goal goal correlations differed significantly depending on the goal scale chosen, the individual items used to assess goal strivings, and sociodemographic characteristics of the sample under study For example, performance-approach goal scales coded as having a majority of normatively referenced items had a positive correlation with performance outcomes ((r) over cap = 14), whereas scales with a majority of appearance and evaluative items had a negative relationship ((r) over cap = 14) Mastery-approach goal scales that contained goal-relevant language were not significantly related to performance outcomes ((r) over cap = 05), whereas those that did not contain goal-relevant language had a positive relationship with performance outcomes ((r) over cap = 14) We concluded that achievement goal researchers are using the same label for conceptually different constructs This discrepancy between conceptual and operational definitions and the absence of goal-relevant language in achievement goal measures may be preventing productive theory testing, research synthesis, and practical application

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据