4.7 Article

Impaired monocyte activation in schizophrenia

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
卷 198, 期 3, 页码 341-346

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.049

关键词

Toll-like receptor; IL-1; Schizophrenia; Innate immunity; Monocyte; Psychoneuroimmunology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An inflammatory process is hypothesized in schizophrenia. Innate immunity, in particular the monocyte/macrophage system, has rarely been studied in this disorder, although alterations in microglia indicate a role for this system. Increased monocyte numbers have repeatedly been described. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) mediate the activation of monocytes. We studied the expression of the toll-like receptors TLR-2, TLR-3 and TLR-4 on CD14(+) monocytes in 31 schizophrenia patients and 31 sex-and age-matched healthy controls. Blood samples were taken and stimulated with either lipopolysaccharides (LPS), to mimic a bacterial infection, or polyl:C, to mimic a viral infection. Moreover, the intracellular concentration of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) in CD33(+) monocytes was estimated before and after stimulation. The intracellular concentrations of IL-1 beta and the TLR surface markers were analyzed by flow cytometry. Receptor expression of TLR-3 and TLR-4, but not of TLR-2. was significantly higher in the schizophrenia patients. After stimulation, patients showed less increase in the expression of TLR-3 and TLR-4 than controls did. The IL-1 beta concentration was significantly lower in patients both before and after stimulation with polyl:C, and there was a trend towards a lower concentration after LPS stimulation. The higher expression of TLR-3 and TLR-4 receptors might compensate for a functional deficit, and the lower intracellular concentrations of IL-1 beta might reflect the blunted monocytic function in schizophrenia. The immunological dysfunctions might be associated with a poor clearance of pathogens in schizophrenia, which in turn could lead to a low-grade inflammatory process. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据