4.5 Article

Effect of different challenge doses after repeated citalopram treatment on extracellular serotonin level in the medial prefrontal cortex:: In vivo microdialysis study

期刊

PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES
卷 62, 期 5, 页码 568-574

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01851.x

关键词

citalopram; in vivo brain microdialysis; medial prefrontal cortex; serotonin; SSRI

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Science and Culture [16659299, 19591333]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19591333, 16659299] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: In order to elucidate the relevance between the delayed onset of clinical efficacy of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI) and extracellular 5-HT levels in the medial prefrontal cortex, the present study compared the ability of low-dose (3 mg/kg) and high-dose (30 mg/kg) citalopram to increase extracellular 5-HT levels in the medial prefrontal cortex following repeated citalopram treatment using in vivo microdialysis. Methods: An SSRI, citalopram, was given 10 mg/kg, s.c. twice daily for 6 days and once on the seventh day in rats. On the eighth day, rats received a single injection of citalopram (3 or 30 mg/kg s.c.), and extracellular 5-HT levels were assessed in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats using in vivo brain microdialysis. Results: There was no significant difference in basal extracellular 5-HT levels between the repeated citalopram group and the repeated saline group. The low-challenge dose of citalopram (3 mg/kg) produced significantly greater increases (170-200% at each time point) in the repeated citalopram group than in the repeated saline group (150%). The high-challenge dose of citalopram (30 mg/kg), however, increased extracellular 5-HT levels by 200-250% of basal levels in the repeated citalopram group, which was similar to the increases in the repeated saline group. Conclusions: Repeated SSRI treatment enhances the effect of low-dose SSRI on extracellular 5-HT levels but not that of high-dose SSRI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据