4.4 Article

Numerical study on the effect of semi-buried straw checkerboard sand barriers belt on the wind speed

期刊

AEOLIAN RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 101-107

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.10.002

关键词

Straw checkerboard; Straw height; Leaf area density; Sand transport rate; Near-surface wind speed

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11072097, 11232006, 11202088, 10972164, 11121202]
  2. Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [308022]
  3. Science and technology project of Gansu Province [1208RJYA006]
  4. National Key Technology RD Program [2013BAC07B01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the spatial variation of wind speed along a straw checkerboard barriers belt and the effect of size and characteristic of the straw checkerboard on the wind speed were studied by computational fluid dynamics. Our results show that the spatial variation of wind speed along a straw checkerboard sand barriers belt can be divided into three stages, i.e., descent stage, stable stage and recovery stage, and the variation of wind speed with height satisfy three different log-linear functions, i.e., the log-linear function below the straw height, the log-linear function between the straw height and the critical height, and the log-linear function above the critical height. The straw height and the leaf area density have obvious influence on the spatial variation of wind speed. And we firstly gave formulas to describe the variation of near-surface wind velocity which had considered the influence of the size and the leaf area density of straw checkerboard barriers. Furthermore, the prediction formula of sand transport rate above straw checkerboard was given based on the ratio of near-surface wind speed and the incoming wind speed. According to these formulas, we can predict the lifetime of the straw checkerboard barriers belt and give optimal design on how to pave straw checkerboard. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据