4.1 Article

Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of human plasma-derived microvesicles to find protein signatures of abdominal aortic aneurysms

期刊

PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
卷 8, 期 7-8, 页码 620-625

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prca.201400010

关键词

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Microvesicles

资金

  1. EC
  2. FAD project (FP-7) [HEALTH F2-2008-200647]
  3. Spanish MICIN [SAF2013/42525]
  4. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Redes RIC, biobancos [RD12/0042/00038, RD09/0076/00101]
  5. Fundacion Conchita Rabago
  6. Region Midi-Pyrenees
  7. European funds (FEDER, Fonds europeens de developpement regional)
  8. French Ministry of Research (Investissements d'avenir, Proteomics French Infrastructure)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To find potential biomarkers of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), we performed a differential proteomic study based on human plasma-derived microvesicles. Experimental design: Exosomes and microparticles isolated from plasma of AAA patients and control subjects (n = 10 each group) were analyzed by a label-free quantitative MS-based strategy. Homemade and publicly available software packages have been used for MS data analysis. Results: The application of two kinds of bioinformatic tools allowed us to find differential protein profiles from AAA patients. Some of these proteins found by the two analysis methods belong to main pathologicalmechanisms of AAA such as oxidative stress, immune-inflammation, and thrombosis. Conclusions and clinical relevance: Data analysis from label-free MS-based experiments requires the use of sophisticated bioinformatic approaches to perform quantitative studies from complex protein mixtures. The application of two of these bioinformatic tools provided us a preliminary list of differential proteins found in plasma-derived microvesicles not previously associated to AAA, which could help us to understand the pathological mechanisms related to this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据