4.5 Article

Plasma profiles in active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Biomarkers and biological implications

期刊

PROTEOMICS
卷 10, 期 24, 页码 4415-4430

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000298

关键词

2-D DIGE; Kawasaki disease; MALDI-TOF/TOF MS; Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis; Systems biology

资金

  1. Dana Foundation
  2. The Wasie Foundation
  3. Lucille Packard Foundation for Children's Health Initiative
  4. NIH
  5. American College of Rheumatology Research
  6. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [T32AR050942]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) is a chronic arthritis of children characterized by a combination of arthritis and systemic inflammation. There is usually non-specific laboratory evidence of inflammation at diagnosis but no diagnostic test. Normalized volumes from 89/889 2-D protein spots representing 26 proteins revealed a plasma pattern that distinguishes SJIA flare from quiescence. Highly discriminating spots derived from 15 proteins constitute a robust SJIA flare signature and show specificity for SJIA flare in comparison to active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis or acute febrile illness. We used 7 available ELISA assays, including one to the complex of S100A8/S100A9, to measure levels of 8 of the15 proteins. Validating our DIGE results, this ELISA panel correctly classified independent SJIA flare samples, and distinguished them from acute febrile illness. Notably, data using the panel suggest its ability to improve on erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein or S100A8/S100A9, either alone or in combination in SJIA F/Q discriminations. Our results also support the panel's potential clinical utility as a predictor of incipient flare (within 9 wk) in SJIA subjects with clinically inactive disease. Pathway analyses of the 15 proteins in the SJIA flare versus quiescence signature corroborate growing evidence for a key role for IL-1 at disease flare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据